Proposal and evaluation of a practice session including a learning tennis wall

Alexis Herbaut; Aurore Valgalier; Guillaume Divrechy; Damien Caby; Matthieu Foissac

doi:10.52383/itfcoaching.v32i91.396

Authors

Alexis Herbaut Decathlon SportsLab
Aurore Valgalier
Guillaume Divrechy
Damien Caby
Matthieu Foissac

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v32i91.396

Keywords:

skill acquisition, constraints based approach, pedagogical equipment, exercises

Abstract

Tennis is a challenging sport to learn. Novice children players (5-8 years old) need a certain amount of practice to reach both consistency and mastery in their strokes. In an attempt to support the coach and help the players to remain active, ©Artengo designed an equipment consisting of increasing the hitting volume during a practice session: The Tennis Wall. The objectives of the present study were i) to propose a practice session including the use of the Tennis Wall, ii) to evaluate the influence of adding the Tennis Wall on the hitting volume in a practice session with novice children tennis players. A practice session with the Tennis Wall allowed to hit about 3 times more balls for each young tennis player compared with a traditional practice session. Although the results of this study need to be confirmed with a larger sample of participants and more training sessions, they suggest that the Tennis Wall can be an interesting support to learn tennis due to the increased repetition of strikes which contributes to skill acquisition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, K., Davis, A., Cleland, S., Jamison, J., Avischious, G., & Murren, M. (2009). Learn to Rally and Play: Practice Plans and Tips for Coaching Kids Ages 5-17 (E. J. Crawford (ed.); USTA). https://www.quickstartcentral.org/pages/vaquickstartcentral/pdfs/15602_Learn-to-Rally-and-Play.pdf

Buszard, T., Reid, M., Masters, R., & Farrow, D. (2016). Scaling the Equipment and Play Area in Children’s Sport to improve Motor Skill Acquisition: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 46(6), 829–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0452-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0452-2

Fadier, M., Touzard, P., Lecomte, C., Bideau, B., Cantin, N., & Martin, C. (2022). Do serve distance and net height modify serve biomechanics in young tennis players? International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541221114106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541221114106

Farrow, D., & Maschette, W. (1997). The effects of contextual interference on children learning forehand tennis groundstrokes. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 33(2), 47–67.

Larson, E. J., & Guggenheimer, J. D. (2013). The effects of scaling tennis equipment on the forehand groundstroke performance of children. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 12(2), 323–331. http://www.jssm.org

Limpens, V., Buszard, T., Shoemaker, E., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Reid, M. (2018). Scaling Constraints in Junior Tennis: The Influence of Net Height on Skilled Players’ Match-Play Performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 89(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1413230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1413230

Menayo, R., Sabido, R., Fuentes, J. P., Moreno, F. J., & García, J. A. (2010). Simultaneous Treatment Effects in Learning Four Tennis Shots in Contextual Interference Conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(2), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.110.2.661-673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.2.661-673

Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the Development of Coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control (pp. 341–360). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2_19

Newell, K. M., & Rovegno, I. (2021). Teaching Children’s Motor Skills for Team Games Through Guided Discovery: How Constraints Enhance Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2021.724848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724848

Reid, M., Crespo, M., Lay, B., & Berry, J. (2007). Skill acquisition in tennis: research and current practice. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMS.2006.05.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.011

Reid, M., Elliott, B., & Crespo, M. (2013). Mechanics and learning practices Associated with the Tennis forehand: A review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 12(2), 225–231.

Regan, L. (2021). Comparing the traditional and constraints-led approaches to skill acquisition in tennis. ITF Coaching & Sport Science Review , 29(84), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.52383/ITFCOACHING.V29I84.205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v29i84.205

Renshaw, I., & Chow, J. Y. (2018). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676

Shafizadeh, M., Bonner, S., Fraser, J., & Barnes, A. (2019). Effect of environmental constraints on multi-segment coordination patterns during the tennis service in expert performers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(9), 1011–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1538691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1538691

Timmerman, E., De Water, J., Kachel, K., Reid, M., Farrow, D., & Savelsbergh, G. (2015). The effect of equipment scaling on children’s sport performance: the case for tennis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(10), 1093–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.986498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.986498