Fair go: The Principle of Natural Justice for Coaches

Authors

  • Janet A. Young

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v20i58.423

Keywords:

Natural justice, Procedural justice, Due process, Fair treatment, Complaints

Abstract

This paper reviews the principle of natural justice (also known as procedural fairness or due process) in the coach setting. The significance of this principle in resolving complaints and ensuring fair treatment of players is discussed. Practical implications for coaches are highlighted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australian Institute of Sport. (2009). Policy on the deregistration of NCAS coaches. Retrieved January 1, 2009, from http://www.ausport.gov.au/supporting/coachofficial/Guidelines/policy

Healy, D. (2003). Sport and the law: A guide for people involved in sport. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.

International Tennis Federation Code of Ethics for Coaches (n.d.). Retrieved January 1, 2009, from http://www.itftennis.com/coaching/practicalinfo/codeofethics.asp

Martens, R. (2004). Successful coaching (3rd ed.). Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics.

Martin, E.A. (Ed.) (2003). Oxford dictionary of law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Published

2012-12-31

How to Cite

Young, J. A. (2012). Fair go: The Principle of Natural Justice for Coaches. ITF Coaching & Sport Science Review, 20(58), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v20i58.423

Issue

Section

Articles