Tennis development at the ground level: Coaches’ perceptions of how incentive structures impact the development systems national tennis associations implement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v32i91.487Keywords:
Coaches, Incentive Structures, National Tennis Associations, Tennis DevelopmentAbstract
National Tennis Associations operate within the confines of a market-driven environment. An environment creating incentive structures forcing NTAs to be cognizant of revenue generation, which may impact how tennis development systems are designed and implemented, affecting how tennis products and services are delivered at the micro-level. Therefore, the study sought to examine coaches’ perspectives of how tennis delivery at the ground level is shaped by the incentive structures created by NTAs’ implementation of tennis development systems. Findings from eight interviews with experienced coaches demonstrate how coaches feel compelled to compromise some of their ideals in their delivery of tennis services, feel the pressure of competitive youth tennis can be overwhelming for players, and believe a team-oriented tournament structure can alleviate some of the concerns arising from extant incentive structures. Findings show the need to consider how tennis’s existence in a market-driven economy shapes how tennis is managed and delivered, and provide an initial foundation for future research.
Downloads
References
Bowers, M. T., & Ozyurtcu, T. (2018). Reducing bias to shift demand: A model for reforming youth sports in America. Sport & Entertainment Review, 4, 33-40.
Coakley, J. (2021). Neoliberalism and community sport coaching in the United States: Meeting challenges with an informed strategy. In B. Ives., P. Potrac., L. Gale., & L. Nelson (Eds.), Community sport coaching: Policies and practice (pp. 25-44). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159063-2
Dixon, M. A., & Bruening, J. E. (2007). Work–family conflict in coaching I: A top-down perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 21(3), 377-406. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.21.3.377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.21.3.377
Gould, D., Lauer, L., Rolo, C., Jannes, C., & Pennisi, N. (2006). Understanding the role parents play in tennis success: a national survey of junior tennis coaches. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(7), 632-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.024927
Green, M. (2007). Olympic glory or grassroots development? Sport policy priorities in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, 1960-2006. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 24(7), 921-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523360701311810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523360701311810
Horne, E., & Brown, M. (2019). The retention of adult sport participants: The challenge of player ratings. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 11(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.18666/JASM-2019-V11-I1-9226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18666/JASM-2019-V11-I1-9226
Horne, E., Lower-Hoppe, L., & Green, B. C. (2023). Co-creation in youth sport development: examining (mis) alignment between coaches and parents. Sport Management Review, 26(2), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2050107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2050107
Horne, E., Woolf, J., & Green, B. C. (2022). Relationship dynamics between parents and coaches: are they failing young athletes?. Managing Sport and Leisure, 27(3), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1779114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1779114
Hyman, M. (2012). The most expensive game in town: The rising cost of youth sports and the toll on today’s families. Beacon Press.
Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K.J. Klein & S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). Jossey-Bass.
Newman, T. J., Ortega, R. M., Lower, L. M., & Paluta, L. M. (2016). Informing priorities for coaching education: Perspectives from youth sport leaders. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(3), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954116645207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954116645207
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Sherry, E., Shilbury, D., & Wood, G. (2007). Wrestling with “conflict of interest” in sport management. Corporate Governance, 7(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710756544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710756544
Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2014). Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: From process to product. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852187
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Edward Horne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
