Winning or losing in wheelchair Grand Slam tournaments

Authors

  • Alejandro Sánchez
  • Antonio Ortega
  • David Sanz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v26i74.269

Keywords:

Adapted sport, performance, surfaces, tennis

Abstract

In 2016, Wimbledon included Wheelchair Tennis within their competition programme for the first time. Thus, today, this sport is present in all three main types of surface (hard, clay and grass). Competition statistics can help to understand the differences in the game depending on the surface. Therefore, the objective of this study will be to observe the possible differences in service between winners and losers in elite wheelchair tennis, both masculine and feminine players, in different surfaces. 42 matches that consisted of 101 sets in three of the 2016 Grand Slams were analysed: Australian Open (AO), Roland Garros (RG) and Wimbledon (W). Results showed that between winners and losers performance varies depending on the surface.
The conclusions of this study can help coaches to adapt their training sessions in relation to the competition surface.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cavedon, V., Zancanaro, C., & Milanese, C. (2014). Kinematic analysis of the wheelchair tennis serve: Implications for classification. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 24(5), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12182

Cross, R., & Pollard, G. (2009). Grand Slam men’s singles tennis 1991-2009. Serve speeds and other related data. Coaching & Sport Science Review, 16(49), 8–10.

ITF. (2018). Wheelchair Tennis Regulations. ITF. London.

Knight, G., & O’Donoghue, P. (2012). The probability of winning break points in Grand Slam men’s singles tennis. European Journal of Sport Science, 12(6), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2011.577239

Lago-Peñas, C., Lago-Ballesteros, J., Dellal, A., & Gómez, M. (2010). Game-related statistics that discriminated winning, drawing and losing teams from the Spanish soccer league. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9(2), 288–293.

Ortega, E., Villarejo, D., & Palao, J. M. (2009). Differences in game statistics between winning and losing rugby teams in the six nations tournament. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8(4), 523–527.

Reid, M., Elliott, B., & Alderson, J. (2007). Shoulder joint kinetics of the elite wheelchair tennis serve. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(11), 739–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.036145

Sánchez-Pay, A., Palao, J. M., Torres-Luque, G., & Sanz-Rivas, D. (2015). Differences in set statistics between wheelchair and conventional tennis on different types of surfaces and by gender. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15(3), 1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868860

Sánchez-Pay, A., Torres-Luque, G., Cabello Manrique, D., SanzRivas, D., & Palao, J. M. (2015). Match analysis of women’s wheelchair tennis matches for the Paralympic Games. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868777

Sánchez-Pay, A., Torres-Luque, G., Fernandez-García, Á. I., SanzRivas, D., & Palao, J. M. (2017). Differences in game statistics between winning and losing for male wheelchair tennis players in Paralympics Games. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 23(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574201700030011

Published

2018-04-30

How to Cite

Sánchez, A., Ortega, A., & Sanz, D. (2018). Winning or losing in wheelchair Grand Slam tournaments. ITF Coaching & Sport Science Review, 26(74), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v26i74.269

Issue

Section

Articles