Aplicación de la Práctica Variable al Entrenamiento de la Técnica en el Tenis

David Sanz; Francisco Javier Moreno Hernández

doi:10.52383/itfcoaching.v21i60.457

Authors

David Sanz
Francisco Javier Moreno Hernández

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v21i60.457

Keywords:

Coaching, Learning, Technique, Variable practice, Dynamic systems

Abstract

The human being is interpreted as a complex system with a capacity to adapt, and in continuous interaction with his environment (Kelso, 1995). Any variation around him will create changes in the system to adjust to the surrounding conditions. This capacity to adapt, a characteristic of the biologic system, is an appropriate reference to understand the motor learning processes (Davids, Button & Bennett, 2008). Learning stems from an adaptation process that the learner goes through. If the tasks proposed are repeated, the system tends to aim for a new balance with new features depending on the characteristics of the tasks. That is, the direction of the behavior changes we produce will depend on the conditioning tasks (Moreno 2006). It is at this point that variable practice appears, making the tennis player explore his/her motor-perceptive skills, looking for new coordination patterns or attractors so that the most appropriate technical patterns solve the different game situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benko, U. y Lindinger, S. (2007). Differential coordination and speed training for tennis footwork. Coaching and Sport Science Review, 41, 10-11 (parte 1); 43, 6-8 (parte 2).

Crespo, M. y Reid, M. (2007). Metodología de la enseñanza del tenis para principiantes. Stadium, 8-13.

Crespo, M. (2011). El enfoque sistémico aplicado al entrenamiento del tenis. E-coach, 9, 15-24.

Davids, K., Button, C. & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-led Approach. Champaign, Illinois. Human Kinetics.

Elliot, B. Reid, M. y Crespo, M. (2009). Techinique development in tennis stroke production. London: International Tennis Federation.

Gentile, A. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1972.10519717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1972.10519717

Kelso, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The self organisation of brains and behaviour. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

Menayo, R. (2010). Análisis de la relación entre la consistencia en la ejecución del patrón motor del servicio en tenis, la precisión y su aprendizaje en condiciones de variabilidad. Tesis Doctoral. Cáceres: Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad de Extremadura.

Menayo, R. y Fuentes, J.P. (2011). Aprendizaje diferencial y práctica variable como medios para optimizar la ejecución del servicio en tenis. E-Coach, 10: 5-11.

Moreno, F. J., Avila, F., Damas, J., Garcia, J.A., Luis, V., Reina, R., & Ruiz, A. (2003). Contextual interference in learning precision skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.121 https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.97.5.121-128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.97.5.121-128

Moreno, F.J. (2006). Variabilidad, adaptación y aprendizaje de habilidades cerradas. I Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Control Motor. Melilla.

Moreno, F. J.; Ordoño, E. M. (2009). Aprendizaje motor y síndrome general de adaptación. Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 22, 1-21

Moreno, F.J y Beneroso, F. (2009). Criterios metodológicos en el trabajo de la técnica basados en el Síndrome General de Adaptación. E-Coach, 5: 24-37.

Neumaier, A. (2002). Enfoque científico del entrenamiento de la técnica. En J.R. Nitsch, A. Neumaier, H. Marées, y J. Mester (eds.), Entrenamiento de la técnica (193-243). Barcelona: Paidotribo.

Newell. K.M. (2003) Schema theory (1975): Retrospectives and prospectives. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 74, 373- 388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609108

Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770

Schmidt, R.A. (2003) Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflection and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 74, 366-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106

Schmidt, R.A. & Lee, T. (2005). Motor Control and Learning. A behavioural emphasis. Illinois. Human Kinetics.

Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York. McGraw-Hill.

Sherwood, D.E. & Lee, T.D. (2003) Schema theory: Critical review ans implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 74, 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609107

Stone, M., H. O'Bryant, J. Garhammer, J. McMillan & R. Rozenek. (1982). A theoretical model of strength training. National Strength & Conditioning Association Journal, 4(4), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1519/0199-610X(1982)004<0036:ATMOST>2.3.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/0199-610X(1982)004<0036:ATMOST>2.3.CO;2

Ulrich, B.D. & Reeve, T.G. (2005) Studies in motor behavior: 75 Years of research in motor development, learning, and control. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 76, 2 SUPPL. S62-S70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599290 https://doi.org/10.5641/027013605X13100559650128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599290

Wallace, S. (1997). Dynamic Pattern Perspective of Rhythmic Movement: A Tutorial. en Zelaznik, H.N. (Ed.) Advances in Motor Learning and Control. Illinois. Human Kinetics.